In the year 1587, inside the Vatican’s Palace of the Congregations, a weary canon lawyer named Prospero Fani received an assignment he did not want. He was to become the Promotor Fidei —the Promoter of the Faith. Everyone else called it by its bitter nickname: the Devil’s Advocate.
For six months, Prospero read the friar’s letters. He found a phrase in one letter that suggested the friar believed salvation could be earned by suffering alone, bypassing Christ’s grace. He raised the objection. The friar’s supporters argued it was a copyist’s error. Prospero demanded the original manuscript. It took three months to arrive from Naples. The original read differently—the friar had been orthodox after all. Prospero noted the correction without apology. That was his duty.
Not literally, of course. Prospero’s task was to scrutinize every piece of evidence in the canonization cause of a deceased Franciscan friar from Naples. He would argue against the miracles. He would question the witnesses. He would dig through the candidate’s writings, searching for heresy, pride, or political manipulation. If Prospero found a single legitimate flaw, the cause would collapse. The friar would remain a mere dead man, not a saint.
Prospero took his seat in the ornate Hall of Beatifications. Across from him sat the Promotor Iustitiae —God’s Advocate—whose job was to build the case for the friar’s sanctity. The two men were not enemies, but they were not friends either. They were a legal mechanism, a human engine of truth.
Write a speech encouraging your classmates to reduce waste.
Write a blog post about the benefits of technology in daily life.
What Examiners Look For
Paper 1 is graded on three main criteria:
Criterion A: Language
Range and accuracy of vocabulary and grammar.
Variety of sentence structures (simple + complex).
Correct use of characters.
Criterion B: Message
Relevance and development of ideas.
Clarity of communication.
Ability to expand with examples and explanations.
Criterion C: Conceptual Understanding
Appropriateness of register (formal/informal).
Conventions of the text type (e.g., date and closing in a letter).
Awareness of cultural and thematic context.
Common Challenges in Paper 1
Forgetting text-type conventions (e.g., missing date in a diary entry).
Writing too little or too much — examiners want clarity, not quantity.
Overusing simple sentences without showing variety.
Misunderstanding the prompt and going off-topic.
Spending too long planning and not enough writing.
Strategies for Success
1. Master Text Types
Each format has unique conventions. For example:
Diary entry: Date at the top, informal tone, reflection of feelings.
Blog post: Title, conversational style, engagement with readers.
Formal letter: Date, address, formal greeting and closing.
Practice writing at least one example of each text type before the exam.
2. Expand Ideas
Examiners want depth, not short answers. Expand by:
Giving reasons (因为…所以…).
Adding examples (比如…).
Explaining consequences (因此…).
3. Use Connectors
Make writing flow with connectors like:
首先, 其次, 最后 (firstly, secondly, finally).
另外, 而且, 但是 (in addition, moreover, but).
因此, 所以, 总的来说 (therefore, so, in conclusion).
4. Build Thematic Vocabulary
Organize word banks around the five themes. For example, for Sharing the Planet, learn words related to environment and sustainability.
5. Manage Time Wisely
5–10 minutes: Plan outline (intro, body, conclusion).
50–65 minutes: Write the text.
5–10 minutes: Proofread for errors.
Practice Tasks for Paper 1
Write a speech encouraging students to exercise more.
Write a blog post about your experience with social media.
Write a formal letter to your principal suggesting changes to the school cafeteria.
Write a diary entry describing a memorable family holiday.
Practicing a variety of tasks ensures you’re ready for any prompt.
Tips for SL vs HL
SL: Focus on accurate grammar and vocabulary with clear structure. Depth is valued, but brevity works if well-developed.
HL: Show wider vocabulary, more cultural references, and deeper analysis. HL students are expected to expand beyond personal anecdotes into broader social or cultural issues.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Ignoring the audience: Writing a speech as if it were a diary entry.
Repetition of basic words: Overuse of 好, 大, 小. Use synonyms.
There’s no fixed word count, but most strong responses are about 250–400 characters at SL and 350–450 characters at HL. Focus on clarity and completeness, not length.
2. Do spelling mistakes in characters lose marks?
Yes, consistent errors in writing characters can affect Criterion A (Language). Occasional mistakes won’t ruin your score, but repeated errors lower accuracy marks.
3. What’s the best way to prepare for Paper 1?
Practice! Write different text types, review teacher feedback, and memorize useful connectors and set phrases. Organizing vocabulary by theme makes it easier to adapt quickly in the exam.
Conclusion
IB Chinese B Paper 1 tests your ability to write effectively in Chinese — not just accurate grammar, but also clear communication, appropriate style, and cultural understanding. With practice across text types, thematic vocabulary, and exam timing, you can approach Paper 1 with confidence.
Remember: examiners value clarity, organization, and relevance over perfection. By focusing on what matters most, you’ll maximize your marks and strengthen your overall IB Chinese B performance.
RevisionDojo provides text-type practice tasks, sample answers, and vocabulary guides to help you prepare effectively for Paper 1. With the right strategies, this exam becomes one of the most predictable and rewarding parts of IB Chinese B.
Struggling to get your teen to see the bigger picture with IB? Learn how to encourage long-term thinking and how RevisionDojo supports lasting success.
The Devils Advocate • No Sign-up
In the year 1587, inside the Vatican’s Palace of the Congregations, a weary canon lawyer named Prospero Fani received an assignment he did not want. He was to become the Promotor Fidei —the Promoter of the Faith. Everyone else called it by its bitter nickname: the Devil’s Advocate.
For six months, Prospero read the friar’s letters. He found a phrase in one letter that suggested the friar believed salvation could be earned by suffering alone, bypassing Christ’s grace. He raised the objection. The friar’s supporters argued it was a copyist’s error. Prospero demanded the original manuscript. It took three months to arrive from Naples. The original read differently—the friar had been orthodox after all. Prospero noted the correction without apology. That was his duty. The Devils Advocate
Not literally, of course. Prospero’s task was to scrutinize every piece of evidence in the canonization cause of a deceased Franciscan friar from Naples. He would argue against the miracles. He would question the witnesses. He would dig through the candidate’s writings, searching for heresy, pride, or political manipulation. If Prospero found a single legitimate flaw, the cause would collapse. The friar would remain a mere dead man, not a saint. In the year 1587, inside the Vatican’s Palace
Prospero took his seat in the ornate Hall of Beatifications. Across from him sat the Promotor Iustitiae —God’s Advocate—whose job was to build the case for the friar’s sanctity. The two men were not enemies, but they were not friends either. They were a legal mechanism, a human engine of truth. For six months, Prospero read the friar’s letters
